And then M. Jolondz expresses great idea: "The discovery of oncogenes in each cell of the body in our opinion, shows something quite different from what scientists had hoped. Painting was the opposite. Became apparent complete futility of hopes for the opportunity to build the anti body's defense of preventive interventions in the genetic apparatus of cells.
These are the words of the great man of science! But, apparently, prevented the author to go further in the conclusions of the conventional view of cancer. Always a problem of any specialist is that it is impossible and it is difficult to go beyond the framework in which it is delivered. Here is another contradiction, on the one hand (noted above) he says that there is oncogenic in each organism, and that it activates, they can cause cancer, but on the other hand - talking about baseless gene interference.
If oncogenes existed, without doubt, would be for them to work to prevent cancer.
Indeed, intervention in the genetic apparatus will give nothing! And just because a cancer cell, it is only the outcome of the pathological process. In cancer cells have begun irreversible, and she lost to the body FOREVER. People will not be able any irreversible cellular process back into a reversible state, and we must not forget that such actions - this is another new pathology. And the body does not, he always destroys the abnormal cells.
Interference in genetic apparatus is not less successful, perhaps even stronger and will damage healthy cells!
- At least an interesting look Jolondz M.: "Misconceptions brand name viagra about the possibilities of antitumor immunological protection of the human body by means of false hope and the possibility of" switching off "oncogenes each cell in the body ... hit" scientific body "of immunology and gave no less cruel metastases in" scientific organization "Oncology , biology, microbiology ....
The fact of the matter is that the immune system of any individual (we emphasize - that the immune system, without exception, each person) is always able to recognize initially encountered tumor cells and at the same time is not always able to do so, because the protective elements of the immune system does not contact with primary tumors arising in the course of many years of development! The immune system actually has no way to recognize (though able to do so) primarily caused tumor cells, and moreover, is not able to destroy them. The true causes of "failure" of the immune anti-tumor protection is that the immune system was credited with anticancer functions, which it never fulfilled and evolutionarily to perform should not. ... This failure is programmed evolution, which, unfortunately, not reflected in the immunological presentation.
Truly a revolutionary view, this is a spark! One can not disagree with the fact that immunological means antitumor protection, not create. How to create anti-tumor protection, we can only if we expand the mystery of cancer. And anyway, how to build to something, if it is something for us to have a secret??
And about the errors is correct, but you can not increase the number is already sufficient confusion. Unfortunately, in general, this revolutionary look wrong. But you can not say contradictory and mutually exclusive categories. Well there can not be like that. On the one hand, without exception, the immune system can recognize, on the other hand - no. And it can not recognize if it is given? Can not, because it should not be evolutionarily. ?? That way you can arrange to ...
If the immune system is given to recognize abnormal cells and fight them, it always will do so and well doing. Because of their ignorance, we are constantly exposing the body influences, in which there are short on time, the pathological processes. With these effects as well as manages the immune system. Traces of this protective response, we therefore do not see.
Since the inception of the first cancerous cells the immune system copes with formed by cancer cells. But she makes it to ... to a point. And all this is confirmed by a sufficient number of experimental data. Why does the immune system with a certain time becomes unable to protect against cancer cells, or that it interferes with? That is the resolution of this issue and will look at the nature of cancer, and other diseases, too.
- M. Jolondz: "... left without commenting erroneous statements academician S. Severin a" transformation of a normal cell into a cancer "and" transformation, ie cancer "cells. In fact, it may be only the tumor cells, but not yet cancerous. Prof. R. Weinberg (USA) also makes a mistake, saying that oncogenes alone do not cause cancer. In fact, oncogenes do not cause cancer, they cause the appearance of malignant tumor cells but not cancer. Clone of descendants of this cell can turn into cancer. "
One can not but pay tribute to the fact that M. Jolondz can eye for beautiful things. But you can not replace both concepts that emerged from numerous experiments. In these statements the author Viagra a history of impotence himself makes a gross mistake. Correctly noticed that oncogenes do not cause cancer, and immediately becomes completely ignorant and contradictory statement that oncogenes that cause the appearance of malignant tumor cells. It looks shocking. This is the same one and the same abnormal cell.
The experiments show clearly that the abnormal cells arise from healthy cells in the tissue where there was an oven. Already noted that the abnormal cells in which a rapid synthesis and uncontrolled division, which in turn leads to an increase in their numbers (clone) and the transformation of the tumor, it was decided to call the cancer cells or tumor. Is the author does not know these truths. Well, you can not deny so that we can see that in general there is no doubt. Secret of cancer or cancer of the process lies not in cancer cells and not in the tumor. Forgive me readers, these abnormal cells were studied before can not. But the mystery of cancer has not solved.
If you look at cancer cells in a well-developed and mature tumor (in strain), then it is clearly seen various kinds of cancer cells. It is formed from a healthy cell cancerous cells, as well as plenty of cancer cells that education is not the healthy cells and from cancer, and different generations. This is the soils, which allows you to make various deductions and give rise to all sorts of contradictions.
Cancer cells (or the tumor, or cancer) and its clone - it's not that different, once one of the outcomes of the cancerous process. In cancer process is rebirth not only of healthy cells, but also cancer cells. And, unfortunately, the book is sufficient evidence of the substitution or other representations.
- Trying to point out a mistake by Otto Warburg and modern oncology, M. Jolondz very much committed a big mistake. It is especially noticeable when the author tries to talk about cellular nutrition and cellular respiration. Experimentally long ago proved that in any extreme circumstances (illness - not the exception), the cells prefer fats, so it is more valuable and energy-intensive products than glucose.
M. Jolondz mistakes when pointed out that "the cancer cells as a power supply using glucose and glucose only. It has long been proven that one of the features of cancer cells in that they prefer the fat on the rest because it is more energy product.
Traces of time
Luminaries
No comments:
Post a Comment